Canada and health
Milton Friedman, in his book “capitalism and freedom” highlights the problems of government monopoly. All monopolies are bad, he says, but in certain situations, and for a certain instance in time it is sometimes the only option, what we must do is choose between evils, they are, private monopoly, publicly regulated private monopoly and public monopoly. While he does not believe that a private monopoly would inherently perform and better than a public monopoly, the private one has a distinct advantage to the consumer, in that it isn’t set in stone.
Private monopolies have been built up and have then crumbled before, however, a public monopoly, once set up is likely to remain well past the time at which it would be feasible to create a competitive market. This is shown perfectly in Canada’s public healthcare system that has now outlawed private healthcare in some areas.
A public monopoly on healthcare is often justified by saying that a competitive market can’t offer a satisfactory service to everyone who needs it, that the poor would be too poor to get help. This has never been shown in practice, even at the turn of the 20th century when capitalism was at its height in America, there were more charitable acts to create and maintain healthcare for the poor than has ever been seen since. Before the creation of the NHS in the UK there were charitable hospitals that attracted the best doctors in the country due to the social prowess earned from helping the poor. Now however, we have bloated healthcare systems that can no longer perform to a satisfactory level, people die in hospital beds because they have to wait too long for an operation, people live in agony for months, even years because there isn’t enough capacity in the system.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home